AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs AMD Radeon R9 M270X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and AMD Radeon R9 M270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 60% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3641 vs 1204
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 21 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3641 vs 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 306 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1123
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2678
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1123
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2678
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2678 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2678 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M270X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | AMD Radeon R9 M270X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3641 | 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | 306 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17712 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | AMD Radeon R9 M270X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Baffin | Venus |
| Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 21 March 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 623 | 624 |
| Price now | $259.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M270X
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4
