AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 857.1x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1002 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1053 MHz
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 42.12 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 59% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1,348 gflops
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 334
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6322 vs 2268
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20734 vs 7209
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 5180
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 5180
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1002 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1053 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 42.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 1,348 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 648 vs 334 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6322 vs 2268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 vs 7209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 5180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 5180 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 | 648 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2268 | 6322 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7209 | 20734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5180 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5180 | 8496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 306 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Baffin | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 496 | 495 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,348 gflops | 2,138 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 42.12 GTexel / s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |