AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 857.1x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Launch date 1 March 2017 vs 25 October 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 7 GB/s

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1002 MHz
  • Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1053 MHz
  • Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 42.12 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • Around 59% better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 1,348 gflops
  • Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 334
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6322 vs 2268
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20734 vs 7209
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 5180
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 5180
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1392 MHz vs 1002 MHz
Boost clock speed 1392 MHz vs 1053 MHz
Texture fill rate 66.82 GTexel / s vs 42.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops vs 1,348 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 648 vs 334
PassMark - G3D Mark 6322 vs 2268
Geekbench - OpenCL 20734 vs 7209
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 vs 5180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 vs 5180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
334
648
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2268
6322
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7209
20734
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5180
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5180
8496
Name AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark 334 648
PassMark - G3D Mark 2268 6322
Geekbench - OpenCL 7209 20734
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5180 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5180 8496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 306

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Pascal
Code name Baffin GP107
Launch date 1 March 2017 25 October 2016
Place in performance rating 496 495
Type Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $139
Price now $159.99
Value for money (0-100) 46.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1053 MHz 1392 MHz
Core clock speed 1002 MHz 1392 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,348 gflops 2,138 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 640 768
Texture fill rate 42.12 GTexel / s 66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 3,300 million
CUDA cores 768
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.0 GB / s 112 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 7 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready