AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W6150M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD FirePro W6150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,651 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2659 vs 2358
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 286
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 43598
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3360
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 12 November 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 1,651 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2659 vs 2358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 vs 286 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 43598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 1002 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2698 vs 2086
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2698 vs 2086
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 1002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 vs 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 vs 2086 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W6150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD FirePro W6150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2659 | 2358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 286 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | 43598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 2698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 2698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | AMD FirePro W6150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Saturn |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 12 November 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 659 | 661 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | 1,651 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | 51.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 88 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |