AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1002 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1053 MHz
- 661.5x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2296 vs 2086
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2296 vs 2086
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 March 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1002 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1053 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 vs 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 vs 2086 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- 1572.5x better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 341
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2728 vs 2016
- 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 9416
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 vs 341 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2728 vs 2016 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 9416 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 406 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2016 | 2728 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9416 | 51217 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 | 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 | 2086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | Baffin |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 March 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 638 | 639 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1002 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,887 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.50 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s | 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 112.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM with others
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
ATIFireGL V3100
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDFirePro S7150
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
