AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 837 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 876 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 1166.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 19 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 837 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 67.39 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2688 vs 1024
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 2,157 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 427
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 1409
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24431 vs 20842
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 67.39 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 2,157 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 vs 427 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 vs 1409 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24431 vs 20842 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | 630 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1409 | 8190 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20842 | 24431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Baffin | GK110 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 19 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 437 | 438 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,157 gflops | 4,709 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2688 |
| Texture fill rate | 67.39 GTexel / s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro S10000
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile vs
NVIDIAP106-100
