AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 5.1x more pipelines: 2304 vs 448
- 5.6x better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 238 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3716
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3716
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3358
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3358
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 9064 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.869 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Ellesmere | GF100 |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 403 | 576 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1243 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1188 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |