AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 400.4x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 87.5x more memory clock speed: 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) vs 8 GB/s
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 10 June 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) vs 8 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 846 vs 370
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13504 vs 4769
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 931 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 846 vs 370 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13504 vs 4769 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 846 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4769 | 13504 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47366 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 22 | GP104 |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 10 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 286 | 284 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Compute performance | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5000 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |