AMD Radeon R4 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• 2.3x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 6.4 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 6.4x more pipelines: 128 vs 20
• 4.5x better floating-point performance: 204.8 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
• 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 2143
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 9.084
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.097 vs 8.335

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 342
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 99
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 4.721
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 vs 107.613
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.445
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 701
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 1338
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1811
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 701
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 1338
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1811

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	342 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	99 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8386 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.721 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.613 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.445 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.612 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.097 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1338 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1811 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1338 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1811 3044

Compare specifications (specs)