AMD Radeon R5 230 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 194
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2480 vs 2264
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2480 vs 2264
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 vs 1 November 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 vs 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 vs 2264 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 320 vs 160
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 548 vs 222
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 4127
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 439
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 439
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 992
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 992
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 548 vs 222 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4936 vs 4127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 vs 992 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 222 | 548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 | 4936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 439 | 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 439 | 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 992 | 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 992 | 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 | 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 | 2264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Caicos | Oland |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 | 1 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1319 | 1406 |
Price now | $50 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay |