AMD Radeon R5 230 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 194
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2480 vs 2264
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2480 vs 2264
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 April 2014 vs 1 November 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 255 vs 194
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2480 vs 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2480 vs 2264

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 320 vs 160
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 548 vs 222
  • Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 4127
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 439
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 439
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 992
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 992
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 320 vs 160
Floating-point performance 499.2 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 548 vs 222
Geekbench - OpenCL 4936 vs 4127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1119 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1119 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1284 vs 992
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1284 vs 992

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
222
548
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
255
194
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4127
4936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
439
1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
439
1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
992
1284
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
992
1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2480
2264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2480
2264
Name AMD Radeon R5 230 AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 222 548
PassMark - G2D Mark 255 194
Geekbench - OpenCL 4127 4936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 439 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 439 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 992 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 992 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2480 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2480 2264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 77.819

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 230 AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 GCN 1.0
Code name Caicos Oland
Design AMD Radeon R5 200 Series
Launch date 3 April 2014 1 November 2013
Place in performance rating 1319 1406
Price now $50
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 6.10

Technical info

Floating-point performance 200.0 gflops 499.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 160 320
Texture fill rate 5 GTexel / s 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 370 million 1,040 million
Boost clock speed 780 MHz
Core clock speed 730 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 1.0 x4
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Length 168 mm 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors N / A None

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.4 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 10.67 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
​PowerPlay