AMD Radeon R5 230 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 160 vs 20
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4127 vs 2143
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2014 vs 3 September 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops vs 46 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 vs 2143 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 222
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 255
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 439
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 439
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 992
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 992
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2480
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2480
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 vs 222 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 vs 439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 vs 439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 vs 992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 vs 992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 vs 2480 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 vs 2480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 222 | 524 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 275 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 | 2143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 439 | 817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 439 | 817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 992 | 1381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 992 | 1381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 | 3044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 | 3044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 230 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Caicos | Haswell GT2 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2014 | 3 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1319 | 1421 |
| Price now | $50 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | |
Technical info |
||
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 46 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 20 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 392 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| PowerPlay | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 230 with others
AMDRadeon R5 230 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 SD
AMDRadeon R5 230 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8610G
AMDRadeon R5 230 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8470D
AMDRadeon R5 230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730M
AMDRadeon R5 230 vs
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile
AMDRadeon R5 230 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 7
