AMD Radeon R5 230 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 160 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 7.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 141 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 83
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 vs 16 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 141 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 83 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
- 9.4x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 494 vs 222
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2480
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2480
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 494 vs 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 222 | 494 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 83 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 | 3309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.986 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.56 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.412 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Caicos | G92B |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 | 16 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1314 |
Price now | $50 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Technical info |
||
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 470.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 47.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 141 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 754 million |
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | 2x 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |