AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 835 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 265 vs 164
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1447 vs 336
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4028 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 835 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion / sec vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 vs 164 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1447 vs 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4028 vs 782 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 | 265 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 336 | 1447 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 782 | 4028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 405.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.098 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3176 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Caicos | GK107 |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1274 | 1277 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 835 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops | 729.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s | 30.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1,270 million |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |