AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
- 16.1x better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 50 gflops
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5150 vs 3210
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 vs 988
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 vs 988
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1841 vs 1702
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1841 vs 1702
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 2808
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 2808
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 3 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 50 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 vs 3210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 vs 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 vs 2808 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 | 3210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 2808 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Oland | Haswell GT2 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 3 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1281 | 1359 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 Ultra
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
ATIRadeon 9250
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8510G
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820A
