AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5233 vs 3725
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5233 vs 3725 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1106
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1106
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1841
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1841
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5233 | 3725 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 717 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Oland | GK208B |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1299 | 1300 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce3 Ti500
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1300
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920M
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 M435
