AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD FirePro W2100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD FirePro W2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 630 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 680 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 915 vs 869
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5767 vs 3724
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.111 vs 10.438
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 vs 0.991
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 19.794
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 50.338
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 1494
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 2329
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 1494
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 2329
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 12 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 630 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 435.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 915 vs 869 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5767 vs 3724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 vs 10.438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 vs 0.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 vs 19.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 vs 50.338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 2329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 2329 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 302
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 vs 253.178
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1677
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1677
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 vs 302 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.646 vs 253.178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1677 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD FirePro W2100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 915 | 869 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 318 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5767 | 3724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 10.438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 289.646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 0.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 19.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 50.338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 2329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 2329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD FirePro W2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Oland |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 12 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1211 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 630 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 435.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 400 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | n / a |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay |