AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD FirePro W2100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD FirePro W2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 680 MHz
• Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
• 8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 400 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 921 vs 883
• Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5827 vs 3715
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.111 vs 10.438
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 vs 0.991
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 19.794
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 50.338
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 1494
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 2329
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 1494
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 2329

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 321 vs 304
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 vs 253.178
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1677
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	921 883
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	304 321
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5827 3715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.111 10.438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	253.178 289.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.211 0.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.777 19.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.506 50.338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 2329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 2329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3346

Compare specifications (specs)