AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 240

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 274
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 5331
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 21.59
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 60.326
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 2342
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 2342

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 896
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 12.111
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 253.178
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 1.211
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1645
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1677
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1645
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	896 902
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	304 274
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5684 5331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.111 13.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	253.178 290.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.211 1.262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.777 21.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.506 60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3353

Compare specifications (specs)