AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 13 November 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 4x more texture fill rate: 74 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 4x better floating-point performance: 2,368 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 vs 900
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 vs 303
- 13.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 5679
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.721 vs 12.111
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 vs 253.178
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 vs 1.211
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 vs 23.777
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 261.843 vs 73.506
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3448 vs 1645
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 2426
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1677
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3448 vs 1645
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 2426
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1677
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 vs 900 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 vs 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 vs 5679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 vs 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 vs 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 vs 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 vs 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 vs 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 1677 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 900 | 4306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 567 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5679 | 74175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 55.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 1282.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 5.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 93.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 261.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Curacao |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 13 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1215 | 510 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |