AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM versus AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 270 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 150 Watt
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 13 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 270
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 925 MHz versus 780 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 74 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- 4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,368 gflops versus 599.0 gflops
- 4.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 versus 900
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 versus 303
- 13.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 versus 5679
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.721 versus 12.111
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 versus 253.178
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 versus 1.211
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 versus 23.777
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 261.843 versus 73.506
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3448 versus 1645
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 2426
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 versus 1677
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3448 versus 1645
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 2426
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 versus 1677
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz versus 780 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 74 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,368 gflops versus 599.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 versus 900 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 versus 303 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 versus 5679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 versus 12.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 versus 253.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 versus 1.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 versus 23.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 versus 73.506 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 versus 1645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 2426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 versus 1677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 versus 1645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 2426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 versus 1677 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 900 | 4306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 567 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5679 | 74175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 55.721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 1282.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 5.927 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 93.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 261.843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Oland | Curacao |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 13 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1215 | 510 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM vs
IntelHD Graphics P530
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
