AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM und AMD Radeon R9 270 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- 3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Startdatum | 30 June 2016 vs 13 November 2013 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 270
- Etwa 19% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 925 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 74 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 3.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1280 vs 384
- 4x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,368 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 vs 900
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 vs 303
- 13.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 5679
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.721 vs 12.111
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 vs 253.178
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 vs 1.211
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 vs 23.777
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 261.843 vs 73.506
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3448 vs 1645
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 2426
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1677
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3448 vs 1645
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 2426
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1677
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 925 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 74 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,368 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 vs 900 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 vs 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 vs 5679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 vs 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 vs 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 vs 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 vs 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 vs 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 1677 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 900 | 4306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 567 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5679 | 74175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 55.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 1282.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 5.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 93.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 261.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Oland | Curacao |
Startdatum | 30 June 2016 | 13 November 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1215 | 510 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 780 MHz | 925 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 730 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 599.0 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 1280 |
Texturfüllrate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,040 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Länge | 210 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 28.8 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |