AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher pipelines: 384 vs 352
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 64.492

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

• Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 730 MHz
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 26.7 billion / sec vs 18.72 GTexel / s
• Around 43% better floating-point performance: 855.4 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2654 vs 896
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 304
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9600 vs 5684
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.079 vs 12.111
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 741.303 vs 253.178
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.516 vs 1.211
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.513 vs 23.777
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2999 vs 1645
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 2426
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 1677
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2999 vs 1645
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 2426
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 1677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	896 2654
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	304 465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5684 9600
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.111 19.079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	253.178 741.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.211 2.516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.777 24.513
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.506 64.492
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 3660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 3660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3321

Compare specifications (specs)