AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 M260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 715 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 162
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1775
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1775
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 6 December 2015 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 vs 162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 1775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 1775 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 994 vs 911
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1893 vs 1645
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1677
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1893 vs 1645
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1677
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 vs 911 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5753 vs 5734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 vs 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 1677 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 M260X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 911 | 994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 162 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5734 | 5753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 1893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 1775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 3158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 1893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 1775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 3158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Opal |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 6 December 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1207 | 1209 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 715 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |