AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 M260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 620 MHz
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 715 MHz
  • Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
  • Around 9% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
  • Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 168
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1775
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1775
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 June 2016 vs 6 December 2015
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 620 MHz
Boost clock speed 780 MHz vs 715 MHz
Texture fill rate 18.72 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 304 vs 168
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2426 vs 1775
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2426 vs 1775

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X

  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 997 vs 921
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5979 vs 5827
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1893 vs 1645
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1677
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1893 vs 1645
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1677
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 997 vs 921
Geekbench - OpenCL 5979 vs 5827
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1893 vs 1645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 vs 1677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1893 vs 1645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 vs 1677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
921
997
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
304
168
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5827
5979
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1645
1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2426
1775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1677
3158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1645
1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2426
1775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1677
3158
Name AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM AMD Radeon R7 M260X
PassMark - G3D Mark 921 997
PassMark - G2D Mark 304 168
Geekbench - OpenCL 5827 5979
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 253.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 23.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 73.506
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1645 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2426 1775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1677 3158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1645 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2426 1775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1677 3158
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM AMD Radeon R7 M260X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Oland Opal
Launch date 30 June 2016 6 December 2015
Place in performance rating 1202 1203
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 780 MHz 715 MHz
Core clock speed 730 MHz 620 MHz
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops 549.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Texture fill rate 18.72 GTexel / s 17.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,040 million
Compute units 6

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.3
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 64 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore