AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 758 MHz
- 28.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 33.5
- 40.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 33.9
- 31.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 60
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz vs 758 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 60 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 12.13 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 388.1 gflops
- 7.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 2981
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 6.331
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 119.568
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.543
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 12.649
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 42.459
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 966
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1363
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1915
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s vs 12.13 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops vs 388.1 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 2981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 vs 6.331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 vs 119.568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 vs 0.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 vs 12.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 vs 42.459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1915 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 22612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 15.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 206.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 1.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 24.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 85.46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 2101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 60 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Wani | Wani |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 31 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1551 | 1435 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 758 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | 526.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 16.46 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 2,410 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |