AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 800 MHz versus 758 MHz
- 28.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 33.5
- 40.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 33.9
- 31.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 versus 60
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz versus 758 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 versus 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 versus 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 versus 60 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Environ 36% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 16.46 GTexel / s versus 12.13 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 256
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 526.8 gflops versus 388.1 gflops
- 7.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 2981
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 6.331
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 versus 119.568
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 versus 0.543
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 versus 12.649
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 42.459
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 966
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 1363
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1915
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s versus 12.13 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 256 |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops versus 388.1 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 2981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 6.331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 versus 119.568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 versus 0.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 versus 12.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 42.459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1915 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2981 | 22612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.331 | 15.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 206.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 1.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 24.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 85.46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 2101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 60 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Wani | Wani |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 31 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1551 | 1435 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 758 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 526.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 16.46 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 2,410 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | System Shared |