AMD Radeon R5 M230 versus NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M230 and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 825 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 547.2 gflops versus 542.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 versus 3025
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.852 versus 0.642
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 versus 11.732
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 versus 16.3
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 versus 861
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 versus 1443
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 versus 861
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 versus 1443
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops versus 542.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 versus 3025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 versus 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 versus 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 versus 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 versus 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 versus 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 versus 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 versus 1443 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Environ 32% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 22.59 GTexel / s versus 17.1 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2800 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 versus 414
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 versus 128
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 versus 8.593
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 versus 143.386
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 versus 985
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 versus 985
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.59 GTexel / s versus 17.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2800 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 versus 414 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 versus 128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 versus 8.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 versus 143.386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 versus 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 versus 985 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 414 | 1090 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 | 3025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 | 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 | 174.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 | 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 | 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 | 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 | 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 | 1443 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Jet | GK107 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1441 | 1442 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
Prix maintenant | $79 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s | 22.59 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 16 GB/s | 44.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |