AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M255 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 612.1 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.288 vs 9.932
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.164 vs 13.613
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.631 vs 15.32
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3334
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3334

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 25.5 GTexel / s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 254.345 vs 166.596
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.14 vs 0.988
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 vs 1459
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 vs 1715
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 vs 1459
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 vs 1715

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M255
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.288 9.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.596 254.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.988 1.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.164 13.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.631 15.32
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1459 1502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 2167
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1459 1502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 2167
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3334

Compare specifications (specs)