AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M255 and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 876 MHz
• Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4491 vs 1839
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.288 vs 6.367
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.596 vs 58.694
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.988 vs 0.396
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.164 vs 7.921
• 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.631 vs 9.393
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1459 vs 1227
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2261
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1459 vs 1227
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2261

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 743 vs 534
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 135
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 1715
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 1715

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M255
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	534 743
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	135 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4491 1839
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.288 6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.596 58.694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.988 0.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.164 7.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.631 9.393
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1459 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 2261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1459 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 2261

Compare specifications (specs)