AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M255 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 940 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 2x better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 541 vs 444
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4720 vs 3776
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3340
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 October 2014 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 940 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 541 vs 444 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4720 vs 3776 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 400 vs 320
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 133
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 320 |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 133 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M255
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M255 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 541 | 444 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 133 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4720 | 3776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.288 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.164 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.631 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1459 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1459 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M255 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Topaz | Madison |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 12 October 2014 | 7 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1365 | 1362 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | 360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 627 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M255 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M255 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800M GTX
AMDRadeon R5 M255 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3800
AMDRadeon R5 M255 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
AMDRadeon R5 M255 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
AMDRadeon R5 M255 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K600
AMDRadeon R5 M255 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M
