AMD Radeon R5 M315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 941 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 9 January 2013
Core clock speed 970 MHz vs 941 MHz
Floating-point performance 745.0 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

  • Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 vs 478
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 143
  • Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4267 vs 3573
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 780
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 780
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 2761
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 2761
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 30.94 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 320
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1330 vs 478
PassMark - G2D Mark 244 vs 143
Geekbench - OpenCL 4267 vs 3573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2351 vs 780
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2351 vs 780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3520 vs 2761
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3520 vs 2761

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
478
1330
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
143
244
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3573
4267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
780
2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
780
2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2761
3520
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2761
3520
Name AMD Radeon R5 M315 NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
PassMark - G3D Mark 478 1330
PassMark - G2D Mark 143 244
Geekbench - OpenCL 3573 4267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 780 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 780 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2761 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2761 3520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 461

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M315 NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Kepler
Code name Meso GK107
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 9 January 2013
Place in performance rating 1138 1141
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Compute units 5
Core clock speed 970 MHz 941 MHz
Floating-point performance 745.0 gflops 742.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 384
Texture fill rate 23.28 GTexel / s 30.94 GTexel / s
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,270 million
Boost clock speed 967 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed 1.1
OpenGL 4.4 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 64.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 4012 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus