AMD Radeon R5 M315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 941 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 9 January 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 970 MHz vs 941 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 745.0 gflops vs 742.7 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 vs 478
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 143
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4267 vs 3573
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 780
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 780
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 2761
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 2761
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 GTexel / s vs 23.28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1330 vs 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 vs 143 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4267 vs 3573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 vs 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 vs 780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 vs 2761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 vs 2761 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M315 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 | 1330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 143 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3573 | 4267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 780 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 780 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2761 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2761 | 3520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M315 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Meso | GK107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 9 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1138 | 1141 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 970 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 745.0 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 23.28 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||

