AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and AMD Radeon R7 250E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 20 December 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.562 vs 14.536
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 vs 120.354
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 vs 1080
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1114
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1716
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 vs 1080
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1114
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 684.8 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 vs 14.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 vs 120.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 1716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4743 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | 21.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | 582.073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 2873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 2873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 3355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M335 | AMD Radeon R7 250E | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Exo | Cape Verde |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 20 December 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1045 | 1046 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
