AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs AMD Radeon R7 250E

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and AMD Radeon R7 250E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 M335

AMD Radeon R7 250E

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 800 MHz
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB

Launch date	21 October 2015 vs 20 December 2013
Core clock speed	1070 MHz vs 800 MHz
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E

Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
Around 20% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
4.1x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.562 vs 14.536
4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 vs 120.354
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 vs 1080
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1114
Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1716
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 vs 1080
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1114
Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1716

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	25.6 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 320
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	21.562 vs 14.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	582.073 vs 120.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2873 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2873 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 1716

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.536

21.562

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

120.354

582.073

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1080

2873

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1114

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1716

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1080

2873

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1114

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1716

3355

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M335	AMD Radeon R7 250E
PassMark - G3D Mark	549
PassMark - G2D Mark	577
Geekbench - OpenCL	4157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.536	21.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	120.354	582.073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1080	2873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1114	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1716	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1080	2873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1114	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1716	3355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		98.052
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M335	AMD Radeon R7 250E
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Exo	Cape Verde
Design	AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date	21 October 2015	20 December 2013
Place in performance rating	1045	1067
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1070 MHz
Compute units	5
Core clock speed	1070 MHz	800 MHz
Floating-point performance	684.8 gflops	819.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	512
Texture fill rate	21.4 GTexel / s	25.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	1,500 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		55 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		168 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	72 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore