AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 M335

NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
2.3x more core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 475 MHz
Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 21.4 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
Around 41% better floating-point performance: 684.8 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 382
Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.536 vs 13.345

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 October 2015 vs 2 November 2010
Core clock speed	1070 MHz vs 475 MHz
Texture fill rate	21.4 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	320 vs 256
Floating-point performance	684.8 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	577 vs 382
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.536 vs 13.345

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

2.6x more memory clock speed: 2808 MHz vs 1100 MHz
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1476 vs 549
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5013 vs 4743
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 306.122 vs 120.354
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2079 vs 1080
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 1114
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1716
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2079 vs 1080
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 1114
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1716

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	2808 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1476 vs 549
Geekbench - OpenCL	5013 vs 4743
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	306.122 vs 120.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2079 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3472 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2079 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3472 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 1716

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

549

1476

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

577

382

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4743

5013

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.536

13.345

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

120.354

306.122

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1080

2079

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1114

3472

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1716

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1080

2079

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1114

3472

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1716

3350

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M335	NVIDIA Quadro 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	549	1476
PassMark - G2D Mark	577	382
Geekbench - OpenCL	4743	5013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.536	13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	120.354	306.122
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1080	2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1114	3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1716	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1080	2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1114	3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1716	3350
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		39.651
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M335	NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Exo	GF100
Design	AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date	21 October 2015	2 November 2010
Place in performance rating	1045	1047
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,199
Price now		$141.66
Value for money (0-100)		17.08
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1070 MHz
Compute units	5
Core clock speed	1070 MHz	475 MHz
Floating-point performance	684.8 gflops	486.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	320	256
Texture fill rate	21.4 GTexel / s	15.2 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,100 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		142 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		241 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	89.9 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	2808 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore