AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 220x more memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 361
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4651 vs 4493
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.536 vs 12.582
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 27 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4651 vs 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 vs 12.582 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 21.4 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 549
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 120.354
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1080
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1114
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 1716
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1080
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1114
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 1716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 21.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 684.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 vs 549 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 120.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 1716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | 1750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4651 | 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | 364.463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 3332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Exo | GK106 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 27 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1040 | 1043 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M335 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9550
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
