Intel HD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon R5 M335
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1070 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1203 vs 549
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4880 vs 4668
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2158 vs 1114
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2158 vs 1114
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3049 vs 1716
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3049 vs 1716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 August 2016 vs 21 October 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1070 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1203 vs 549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4880 vs 4668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 vs 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 vs 1716 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1740 MB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 288
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 979
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 979
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 vs 979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 vs 979 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M335
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1203 | 549 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | 577 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4880 | 4668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 979 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 979 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 | 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 | 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 1716 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Exo |
| Launch date | 5 August 2016 | 21 October 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1039 | 1041 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1070 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1070 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P630 with others
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
ATIRadeon X800 GTO AGP
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
