AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs AMD FirePro W4170M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and AMD FirePro W4170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 210
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 28 April 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 210 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1033 vs 549
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6460 vs 4651
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.502 vs 14.536
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2802 vs 1114
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2689 vs 1716
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2802 vs 1114
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2689 vs 1716
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 684.8 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1033 vs 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 vs 4651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 vs 14.536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 vs 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2689 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 vs 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2689 vs 1716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | AMD FirePro W4170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | 1033 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4651 | 6460 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | 15.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 2689 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M335 | AMD FirePro W4170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Exo | Mars |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 28 April 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1040 | 1042 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz | 900 MHz |
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 1070 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay |