AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs AMD FirePro W4170M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and AMD FirePro W4170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R5 M335

AMD FirePro W4170M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 825 MHz
Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 900 MHz
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 210

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 October 2015 vs 28 April 2014
Core clock speed	1070 MHz vs 825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1070 MHz vs 900 MHz
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	577 vs 210

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M

Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
Around 1% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1035 vs 549
Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6460 vs 4651
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.502 vs 14.536
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2802 vs 1114
Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2689 vs 1716
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2802 vs 1114
Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2689 vs 1716

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	21.6 GTexel / s vs 21.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 320
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops vs 684.8 gflops
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1035 vs 549
Geekbench - OpenCL	6460 vs 4651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.502 vs 14.536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2802 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2689 vs 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2802 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2689 vs 1716

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4170M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

549

1035

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

577

210

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4651

6460

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.536

15.502

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1114

2802

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1716

2689

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1114

2802

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1716

2689

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M335	AMD FirePro W4170M
PassMark - G3D Mark	549	1035
PassMark - G2D Mark	577	210
Geekbench - OpenCL	4651	6460
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.536	15.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	120.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1114	2802
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1716	2689
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1114	2802
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1716	2689

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M335	AMD FirePro W4170M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Exo	Mars
Design	AMD Radeon R5 300 Series
Launch date	21 October 2015	28 April 2014
Place in performance rating	1040	1042
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1070 MHz	900 MHz
Compute units	5
Core clock speed	1070 MHz	825 MHz
Floating-point performance	684.8 gflops	691.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	384
Texture fill rate	21.4 GTexel / s	21.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	1,040 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
AppAcceleration
Enduro
Powerplay