AMD Radeon R5 M335 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M335 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M335
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1070 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 220x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1100 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 versus 361
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4690 versus 4492
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.536 versus 12.582
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 October 2015 versus 27 November 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1070 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1100 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 versus 361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4690 versus 4492 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 versus 12.582 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Environ 58% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 21.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 19% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 684.8 gflops
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1751 versus 549
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 120.354
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1080
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1114
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 1716
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1080
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1114
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 1716
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 21.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 684.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1751 versus 549 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 120.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 1716 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | 1751 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4690 | 4492 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | 364.463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 3332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Exo | GK106 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 21 October 2015 | 27 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1040 | 1043 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1070 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 5 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1070 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 684.8 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.4 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1100 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 M335 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9550
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
