AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 254
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5084 vs 4397
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 65.872 vs 30.177
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1087 vs 1045
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1087 vs 1045

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 649
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 13.812
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 144.604
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 0.981
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 18.55
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1157
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2212
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1157
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2212

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	649 995
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	516 254
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5084 4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.812 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	144.604 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.981 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.55 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.872 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1087 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1157 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2212 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1087 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1157 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2212 3346

Compare specifications (specs)