AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 18 February 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 649
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 516
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 5084
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 13.812
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 144.604
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 0.981
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 18.55
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 65.872
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 1087
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1157
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2212
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 1087
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1157
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2212
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 649 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 5084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 65.872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5084 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 | 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Exo | GM107 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1182 | 707 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |