AMD Radeon R5 M435 versus NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M435
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 38% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.1 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 84% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 547.2 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5816 versus 3722
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 165 versus 119
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 849 versus 716
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1621 versus 1598
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1621 versus 1598
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2016 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5816 versus 3722 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 versus 119 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 849 versus 716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 versus 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 versus 1598 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 versus 1055
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 versus 1055
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2089
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2089
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 780 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2089 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5816 | 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1055 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1055 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2089 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2089 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 | 119 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 849 | 716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 | 1598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Jet | GK208B |
| Date de sortie | 15 May 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1295 | 1297 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 780 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 585 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 32 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
