AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA Quadro K610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5668 vs 1993
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 804 vs 718
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1621 vs 1123
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1621 vs 1123
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 23 July 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 376.3 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5668 vs 1993 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 804 vs 718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 vs 1123 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1055
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1055
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3195 vs 2089
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3195 vs 2089
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 165
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 vs 2089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 vs 2089 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 165 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA Quadro K610M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5668 | 1993 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1055 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1055 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2089 | 3195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2089 | 3195 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 | 219 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 804 | 718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 | 1123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Jet | GK208 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1295 | 1298 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229.99 | |
Price now | $75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 376.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1270 Million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 20.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |