AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 602 MHz
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
  • Around 18% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 172 vs 73
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 May 2016 vs 11 November 2008
Core clock speed 780 MHz vs 602 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 192
Floating-point performance 547.2 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 172 vs 73

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
  • 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 5652
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2089
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2089
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 982 vs 800
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 38.5 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 15302 vs 5652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 2089
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 2089
PassMark - G3D Mark 982 vs 800

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5652
15302
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2089
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2089
3358
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
172
73
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
800
982
Name AMD Radeon R5 M435 NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Geekbench - OpenCL 5652 15302
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2089 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2089 3358
PassMark - G2D Mark 172 73
PassMark - G3D Mark 800 982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1621
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1621

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M435 NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Jet GT200B
Launch date 15 May 2016 11 November 2008
Place in performance rating 1286 1295
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,799
Price now $149.99
Value for money (0-100) 8.67

Technical info

Boost clock speed 855 MHz
Core clock speed 780 MHz 602 MHz
Floating-point performance 547.2 gflops 462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 320 192
Texture fill rate 17.1 GTexel / s 38.5 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,400 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB / s 76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3