AMD Radeon R6 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 240

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R6 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 15.72 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 503.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 616
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 137
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 4083
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 11.201
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 224.132
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.942
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 19.267
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 45.165
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 860
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1784
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3182
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 860
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1784
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3182

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	616 902
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	137 274
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4083 5331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.201 13.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	224.132 290.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.942 1.262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.267 21.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.165 60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	860 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1784 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3182 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	860 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1784 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3182 3353

Compare specifications (specs)