AMD Radeon R6 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R6 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 533 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 15.72 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
- 10.9x better floating-point performance: 503.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 618 vs 522
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4077 vs 2143
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.201 vs 7.844
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 224.132 vs 154.696
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.267 vs 9.084
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 45.165 vs 8.335
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 860 vs 817
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1784 vs 1381
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3182 vs 3044
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 860 vs 817
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1784 vs 1381
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3182 vs 3044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 September 2014 vs 3 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 533 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.72 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 503.0 gflops vs 46 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 618 vs 522 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4077 vs 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.201 vs 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 224.132 vs 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.267 vs 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 45.165 vs 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 860 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1784 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3182 vs 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 860 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1784 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3182 vs 3044 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 600 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 139
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.942
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 vs 139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 vs 0.942 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 618 | 522 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 139 | 277 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4077 | 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.201 | 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 224.132 | 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.942 | 0.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.267 | 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 45.165 | 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 860 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1784 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3182 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 860 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1784 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3182 | 3044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Spectre | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 17 September 2014 | 3 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1414 | 1417 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 533 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 503.0 gflops | 46 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 15.72 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |