AMD Radeon R6 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R6 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 52% higher core clock speed: 533 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 3.4x more texture fill rate: 15.72 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
  • 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
  • 10.9x better floating-point performance: 503.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 619 vs 522
  • Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3987 vs 2149
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.201 vs 7.844
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 224.132 vs 154.696
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.267 vs 9.084
  • 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 45.165 vs 8.335
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 860 vs 817
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1784 vs 1381
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3182 vs 3044
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 860 vs 817
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1784 vs 1381
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3182 vs 3044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 September 2014 vs 3 September 2013
Core clock speed 533 MHz vs 350 MHz
Texture fill rate 15.72 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 20
Floating-point performance 503.0 gflops vs 46 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 619 vs 522
Geekbench - OpenCL 3987 vs 2149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 11.201 vs 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 224.132 vs 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.267 vs 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 45.165 vs 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 860 vs 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1784 vs 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3182 vs 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 860 vs 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1784 vs 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3182 vs 3044

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

  • Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 138
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.942
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 277 vs 138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.958 vs 0.942

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
619
522
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
138
277
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3987
2149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11.201
7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
224.132
154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.942
0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.267
9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
45.165
8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
860
817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1784
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3182
3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
860
817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1784
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3182
3044
Name AMD Radeon R6 Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark 619 522
PassMark - G2D Mark 138 277
Geekbench - OpenCL 3987 2149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 11.201 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 224.132 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.942 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.267 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 45.165 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 860 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1784 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3182 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 860 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1784 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3182 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 152

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R6 Graphics Intel HD Graphics 4400

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Generation 7.5
Code name Spectre Haswell GT2
Launch date 17 September 2014 3 September 2013
Place in performance rating 1413 1416
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 600 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 533 MHz 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 503.0 gflops 46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 384 20
Texture fill rate 15.72 GTexel / s 4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 2,410 million 392 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Memory type System Shared
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync