AMD Radeon R6 Graphics versus Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R6 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 533 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 15.72 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s
- 19.2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 20
- 10.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 503.0 gflops versus 46 gflops
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 20 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 618 versus 522
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4077 versus 2145
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.201 versus 7.844
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 224.132 versus 154.696
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.267 versus 9.084
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 45.165 versus 8.335
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 860 versus 817
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1784 versus 1381
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3182 versus 3044
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 860 versus 817
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1784 versus 1381
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3182 versus 3044
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 September 2014 versus 3 September 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 533 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.72 GTexel / s versus 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 503.0 gflops versus 46 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 20 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 618 versus 522 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4077 versus 2145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.201 versus 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 224.132 versus 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.267 versus 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 45.165 versus 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 860 versus 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1784 versus 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3182 versus 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 860 versus 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1784 versus 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3182 versus 3044 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Environ 92% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 versus 139
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 versus 0.942
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 versus 139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 versus 0.942 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 618 | 522 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 139 | 277 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4077 | 2145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.201 | 7.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 224.132 | 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.942 | 0.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.267 | 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 45.165 | 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 860 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1784 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3182 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 860 | 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1784 | 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3182 | 3044 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Spectre | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 17 September 2014 | 3 September 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1412 | 1415 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 600 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 533 MHz | 350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 503.0 gflops | 46 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.72 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |