AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 86 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 8.039
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.867
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 20.664

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750

• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 720 vs 320
• 2x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 902
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 280 vs 274
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 vs 290.632
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 vs 60.326
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2100 vs 1688
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 2342
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2100 vs 1688
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 2342

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 1045
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 280
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.344 8.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.632 544.041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.262 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.59 20.664
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.326 91.074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3358

Compare specifications (specs)