AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 7790

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 7790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 85 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 988
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2061
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 988
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2061

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7790

• 3.6x more texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• 2.8x more pipelines: 896 vs 320
• 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• 5.2x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 vs 902
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 vs 274
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 vs 5331
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 vs 13.344
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.247 vs 290.632
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 vs 1.262
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 vs 21.59
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 vs 60.326
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 vs 1688
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 vs 1688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7790

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 459
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5331 14832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.344 40.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.632 828.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.262 3.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.59 63.284
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.326 217.744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 5087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 2061
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 5087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 2061

Compare specifications (specs)