AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 320 vs 80
- 4.2x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 236
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 2112
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1247
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1679
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1247
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 vs 236 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 vs 2112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1679 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 274
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 274 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 | 236 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 | 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 | 2112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 | 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 | 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1679 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 240 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Oland | Park |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 7 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1236 | 1077 |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 80 |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2, GDDR2, DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 240 with others
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
