AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 134.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 95% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1048 MB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 426
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 189
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 1161
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 3.121
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 109.787
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 5.005
- 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 8.55
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 660
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1158
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1626
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 660
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1158
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1626
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 134.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1048 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 vs 426 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 vs 189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 vs 1161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 vs 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 vs 109.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 vs 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 vs 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 vs 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 vs 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1626 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 | 426 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 | 189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 | 1161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | 109.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1626 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 240 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Oland | GF108 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
Place in performance rating | 1236 | 1526 |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 48 |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1048 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |