AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
• 3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
• Around 86% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 1150x more memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 383
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 158
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 1571
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 4.046
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 83.907
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.371
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 6.791
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 17.41
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 614
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1162
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1683
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 614
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1162
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1683

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

• Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 383
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 158
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5331 1571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.344 4.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.632 83.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.262 0.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.59 6.791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.326 17.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 1683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 1683

Compare specifications (specs)