AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260 and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 185 Watt
Launch date | 17 December 2013 vs 19 November 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 93.6 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- Around 95% better floating-point performance: 2,995 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1625 MHz
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4470 vs 2892
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 559
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.399 vs 26.189
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.47 vs 798.239
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.371 vs 4.223
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.519 vs 45.294
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 345.793 vs 240.395
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 93.6 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4470 vs 2892 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 vs 559 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.399 vs 26.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.47 vs 798.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.371 vs 4.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.519 vs 45.294 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 345.793 vs 240.395 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 260
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 260 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2892 | 4470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | 661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.189 | 65.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 798.239 | 1230.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.223 | 6.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 | 78.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 | 345.793 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 260 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Bonaire | Tahiti |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 17 December 2013 | 19 November 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $270 |
Place in performance rating | 570 | 521 |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 975 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 93.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 4,313 million |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 192.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |