AMD FirePro D700 vs AMD Radeon R7 260
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D700 and AMD Radeon R7 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 1625 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 vs 26.189
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 vs 798.239
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 vs 4.223
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 vs 45.294
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 17 December 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz vs 1625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 vs 26.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 vs 798.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 vs 4.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 vs 45.294 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 274 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 274 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D700 | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25127 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | 26.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | 798.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | 4.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 | 45.294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2892 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D700 | AMD Radeon R7 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | Bonaire |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 17 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 569 | 570 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 170 mm |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 263.0 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |