AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 vs 25.421
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 804.436 vs 734.936
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 vs 2.31
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 vs 35.434
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 vs 56.706
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 23 October 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 vs 25.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 vs 734.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 vs 2.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 vs 35.434 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 vs 56.706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 896
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4138 vs 3190
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 534 vs 523
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 vs 3845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3571 vs 3485
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 vs 3845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3571 vs 3485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 896 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4138 vs 3190 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 534 vs 523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 vs 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 vs 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 vs 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 vs 3485 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 260X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 260X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3190 | 4138 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | 534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 | 25.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 | 734.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 | 2.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 | 35.434 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 | 56.706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 | 5683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3485 | 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 | 5683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3485 | 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12178 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 260X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Bonaire | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 23 October 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Place in performance rating | 648 | 650 |
| Price now | $239 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3540 Million |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 260X with others
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
AMDFirePro M5100
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
AMDFirePro W5100
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
